A paperfolding paradise
The website of writer and paperfolding designer David Mitchell
|A brief history of recreational paperfolding in Western Europe and Japan until 1931|
This is a history, or historical narrative, rather than a chronology of events. For that reason, on occasion, it jumps backwards and forwards in time. It is also worth noting that this is only a brief history. It does not attempt to cover every known facet of recreational paperfolding, just to sketch in the main outlines of the story.
Creating a historical narrative is rather like playing a game of join-the-dots. You start with a series of discreet facts and try to join them up to create a coherent picture. In the case of the history of recreational paperfolding, particularly the history of recreational paperfolding in Japan, the facts are thin on the ground, and many of the dots are missing. This lack of evidence is largely because objects made of paper are ephemeral and that the record we have of them relies on their chance survival or their mention or appearance in poetry, books, fabrics, drawings and paintings. It is likely that many recreational paperfolds are much older than the earliest evidence for their existence, but, unfortunately, we cannot know, even approximately, how much older they might actually be. It is inevitable, therefore, that any narrative of recreational paperfolding history will be inaccurate in places. I have done the best I can with the facts available to me, but I am sure that this narrative will need to be reworked and rewritten as more facts emerge.
The ideal evidence to substantiate the existence of any specific paperfolding design at an early date is a combination of an illustration (to show us what the design looked like) and a written description (to confirm that the design is in fact made from folded paper). Unfortunately, in many cases, one or the other of these elements is missing. If we only have text it can be difficult to know exactly what design is being described or referred to. If we only have an illustration, then it can sometimes be impossible to know if the design is folded from paper or some other material.
Paper is folded for many purposes, around objects to prevent them from becoming damaged, to create containers to keep things together, or apart, to allow a larger sheet to be stored in a smaller space, to conceal what is written or printed on it, as the basis of entertainments and magical effects, for educational purposes, to illustrate mathematical principles, to create toys and puzzles, to create decorations for the home, as a pastime, as an artform and many, many more. While acknowledging that paperfolding is about all these different things, this brief history concentrates on recreational paperfolding, paperfolding done as a pastime, or a means of personal entertainment, and only mentions other aspects of paperfolding when they are relevant to the development of the main story being told.
Neither folding paper to entertain other people, or folding paper to create toys (that can then be used for recreation), technically fit within this definition, but it would be foolish to overlook them since their story is so closely intertwined with recreational paperfolding per se.
Prior to the modern period we only know of two recreational paperfolding traditions, that of Japan and that of Western Europe / the USA. It is quite conceivable that other independent recreational paperfolding traditions existed in other countries or regions, China and Korea being perhaps the most likely candidates, but there is, at present, insufficient evidence to substantiate this.
At present this brief history only runs until the publication of Origami Part 1 by Isao Honda in 1931. This date has been chosen fairly arbitrarily, but it works as a temporary end point because by that date the idea that paper could be folded for fun as well as practical purposes was well established in both Japan and in Western Europe / the USA. There is also a strong recreational paperfolding tradition in Argentina, but that, I believe, arose at a later date. This brief history will be extended as time allows.
It is also worth remembering that this is not a definitive history. New evidence is being uncovered all the time. Some of this new evidence will no doubt confirm the validity of the historical narratives in this document. Other new evidence will equally undoubtedly require that we reassess what we think we know.
Paper is a thin, usually flat, material made from cellulose fibres which are held together by chemical bonds. Card or cardboard is simply thick or multi-layer paper.
Paper is not, of course, the oldest foldable material. Foodstuffs such as dough, leaves and plant stems, animal skins and leather, cloth and felt, and metals were all folded long before we have any record of the folding of paper. Paper, however, folds in a very different way to these other materials.
We do not know when, where, or by whom paper was first invented, or whether it was invented accidentally or as the result of a deliberate experimental process. Nor do we know whether, if it was the result of a deliberate experimental process, it was intended to be a medium for writing or painting on, wrapping with, or something else entirely. We do not even know whether paper was invented just once in one place or several times independently in several places. What we do know, however, is that the earliest evidence for the existence and use of paper comes from China, and that we can trace the spread of the knowledge of how to make and use it from there to the rest of the world.
We also do not know, of course, when paper was first intentionally folded, although it is reasonable to assume that this would have been not long after it was first discovered.
As far as I know, the earliest known fragment of paper, which can be dated to 8BCE, was discovered near the Yumen Pass at Dunhuang in northwest China. It is approximately 10 centimeters (4 inches) square and made from linen fibres. It has been written on and is likely to have been part of a letter.
By folding I mean any change of direction intentionally induced by any means in the flat plane of the paper. By this definition rolling is a form of folding. Folding does not necessarily imply the making of a crease.
(Incidentally, the word intentionally is included in this definition only because within the terms of this definition it is difficult to pick up any piece of paper without accidentally inducing a change of direction in the flat plane of the paper.)
Paperfolding in Japan up 1931
Much of the earliest evidence for the folding of paper in Japan, apart from the folding of paper for purely practical purposes, like the folding of letters or the use of paper to make folding fans, relates to the folding of tsutsumi (formal wrappers) for flowers displayed (or perhaps given as gifts) on particular commemorative days throughout the year. The first book to contain instructions for folding these wrappers was the 'Onna Chohoki' (Women's Treasury) published in 1692.
A page from the 'Onna Chohoki'
Actual folded examples of many of these wrappers, folded in the third month of 1697, under the instruction of a master of the Ogasawara school of etiquette, survive in an album, Origata Tehon of Kikuchi Fujiwara no Takehide, now held in the collection of the Metropolitan Museum in New York.
A page from the album
The Onna Chohoki also contains instructions for folding Ocho and Mecho (stylised male and female butterflies) which were, and sometimes still are, attached to sake kettles during wedding ceremonies.
Detail of a page from the 'Onna Chohoki'
There are a few tantalising glimpses that something else, much less ceremonial and far more remarkable, was going on. The earliest evidence for this is the appearance of an image of an Orizuru or Paper Crane on a kosuka, a decorative panel intended to be attached to the hilt or sheath of a sword, which can be reliably dated to 1591/3, a full hundred years before the Onna Chohoki was published. This evidence is, however, difficult to interpret. Does it mean that already in the 1590s there was an established culture of representational, and possibly recreational, paperfolding in Japan? Or was this design just an outlier, a one-off, which also had a largely ceremonial purpose? We simply do not know.
The earliest evidence we have of a number of other paperfolding designs comes from kimono patterns featured in pattern books or in ukiyo-e woodblock prints. Most of these designs are of Paper Cranes but other designs also feature.
This drawing of a kimono, that can be dated to 1704, features folded paper takara-bune (treasure ships), of a design somewhat similar to the paperfold now usually known in the West as the Chinese Junk.
This design featuring Paper Boats comes from the pattern book (Chinshoku) Hinagata Miyako fuzoku (Rare and Popular Kimono Patterns of the Capital) by the woodblock printmaker Nishikawa Sukenobu (1671-1750), which was published in 1716.
This print, in which the woman on the left is holding a document folded into a pentagonal knot, comes from Nishikawa Sokenobu's illustrated book 'Hyakunin Joro Shinasadame' (100 Women Classified According to Their Rank), which was published in 1723. (Incidentally, the earliest mention of the design in Western Europe is slightly earlier, in 1682.)
1734 saw the publication of the book 'Ranma Zushiki' by Hayato Ohoka which contains prints of decorations intended to enhance sliding room dividers. Among these is one that shows a group of folded paper objects, including the Paper Crane or Orizuru , Komoso , the Paper Boat, the Sanbo on Legs and the Tematebako (a modular cube made from six Thread Containers).
A print from the 'Ranma Zushiki'
The first volume of Nishikawa Sukenobu's illustrated book 'Ehon masu kagami', which was published in 1748, included a print showing women (or perhaps girls) celebrating the Hina Doll Festival. The women (or perhaps girls) on the left are folding paper. One holds up a Paper Crane. The print also shows a completed Komoso and Paper Boat lying on the floor. It is not clear whether this paperfolding is purely recreational, or ceremonial, and connected in some way with the festival they are celebrating.
A print by the artist Nishikawa Sukenobu
1797 saw the publication of two manuscripts of recreational paperfolding designs:
The most famous of these is the book called 'Senbazuru Orikata' (Folding a Thousand Cranes) in which the designs are created by cutting slits in large squares to divide them into several, or many, smaller, but not completely separate, squares and then folding each of these smaller squares into an Orizuru or Paper Crane. The cranes remain connected by beak, legs, or wingtip when the design is complete.
A page from the 'Senbazuru Orikata'
The less well known is the 'Orikata Tehon Chushingura' a two page manuscript which shows how to fold and display characters from the famous Japanese story called the Chushingura (Treasury of Loyal Retainers) in which the forty-seven ronin attempt to avenge the death of their master, Asano Naganori. All the figures are folded from the same base, which looks rather like a stretched Star of David into which slits have been cut to separate the six points.
After this there is very little until 1845, the date of the writing of the 'Kan No Mado' (Window on Midwinter), a 63 page hand drawn ms which is part of a larger encyclopaedia known as the Kayagarusa. It contains diagrams for 48 varied paperfolding designs, including some of the classic ceremonial designs but also others which look to be purely recreational. Many of these are also made from slit bases but just a few, the Cicada, the Iris, the Snail and the Blow-up Frog are made without using slits. A note on page 24 states that 'Orikata is a favourite pastime for children and greatly enjoyed by them.' It then mentions other designs, the sembazuru (sic), boat, flowers, lotus, sambo, box, komoso, thread container and helmet, which are stated to be already well known and which are not therefore included in the ms (in order to spare the writer's brush.) This implies that the other designs in the book, including the Cicada, Iris, and the Blow-up Frog were not so well known at this time.
A page from the 'Kan No Mado'
Up until this time the paperfolding traditions of Japan and Western Europe (see below) were, as far as we know, entirely separate, and those few instances where similar or identical designs existed in both traditions, notably the Paper Boat and the Thread Container, are almost certainly the result of independent parallel creation.
That situation changed in 1876 when the first Japanese kindergarten was established at the Tokyo Womens Normal School (now Ochanomizu University) by Clara Zitelmann. Paperfolding was at this time an established part of the curriculum of many kindergartens in Western Europe and it is likely that some Western European paperfolds were taught in Japan fairly soon after that date. As a consequence, the two previously separate traditions began to slowly become mixed together. Of course, paperfolding in the kindergarten was not done as recreation but as a means of educating the mind (and the fingers) but it seems unlikely that some children, having once learned these folds, would not reproduce them outside of school for recreation.
Clara Matsuno, Fuyu Toyoda and Hama Kondo playing the Pigeon's Nest game with Ochanomizu University Kindergarten children.
There is evidence of this conflation of traditions a decade or so later in an untitled publication issued by the kindergarten of the Tokyo Women's Normal School in 1878 which contains pictures of several paperfolds, including the Japanese designs of the Kabuto (Samurai Helmet) and the Kikuzara but also of the Western European designs of the Jacket, the Double Boat and the Boat with Sail.
A page from the 1878 publication of the Tokyo Women's Normal School
Similarly,'Kindergarten Shoho' by Iijima Hanjuro, published in 1885, contains mostly designs from the Japanese recreational paperfolding tradition but also a few well-known Western European designs.
A page from 'Kindergarten Shoho'
In 1908, Isao Honda, who was subsequently to become a prolific author of books about paperfolding, travelled to Europe to study painting, which he did in both London and Paris. Sometime later, after his return to Japan, he wrote his seminal work 'Origami Part One' which was published in 1931. (There is also an Origami Part Two, published in 1932, but full details of this work have not yet appeared in the West). The work contains diagrams for 81 designs. Some of these are clearly from the kindergarten tradition, some are designs that had previously appeared in other Japanese books, some are Western napkin-folds, but many others are completely new. In many cases, because of the time Isao Honda had spent in Europe, we cannot be certain whether these previously unknown designs are from the Japanese or Western European traditions, or, indeed, are of Isao Hondas own invention. What does seem clear, however, is that this work is intended to be a book of recreational paperfolds, that is paperfolds that are recorded in order that other people can enjoy folding them for themselves, whatever the particular tradition from which they originally came.
A page from 'Origami Part One'
Paperfolding in Western Europe and the USA up until 1931
There is much more information about the development of paperfolding in Western Europe / the USA than there is about the development of paperfolding in Japan.
Paper was probably first imported into Western Europe from the Islamic countries, but from the 11th Century onwards mills for the manufacture of paper began to be established in Western Europe. I have no doubt that, while this paper may have been intended primarily for writing on, some of it was soon folded for purely practical purposes. At some point paper replaced vellum and parchment as the material of choice for using in codexes and was, of course, widely used for letters and other documents.
It would also, I am sure, have been widely used for packaging, perhaps largely in the form of the ubiquitous Grocers Cone, made by rolling up an oblong sheet of paper diagonally. A Grocers Cone, presumably made from paper, although there is no text to confirm it is paper, appears in the famous painting 'Children's Games' by Peter Bruegel the Elder which dates to 1560.
Detail from 'Children's Games' by Peter Bruegel the Elder
The earliest indisputable evidence we have for folded paper being used for less mundane purposes than these comes from the manuscript 'De Viribus Quantitates' by Luca Pacioli, fundamentally a book of mathematical puzzles, possibly produced in collaboration with Leonardo da Vinci, which dates to between 1496 and 1508. It gives the first known descriptions of the Cherries Puzzle, three methods of sealing a letter without wax, one of which seems to be the Chickenwire Letterfold, and another possibly a precursor of the Love Knot Paperfold, explains how to cook in a pan made of folded paper and gives a method of constructing an accurate right angle, without using compasses, by folding a sheet of paper twice.
There are three earlier documents which appear to illustrate designs folded from paper but, unfortunately, all of them lack any kind of explanatory text to confirm what the pictures show.
A picture in an illustrated version of 'The Decameron' by Boccacio, now held in the library of Arsenal, in Paris, and dateable to 1432, depicts a white coloured box, which looks very much as though it is folded from paper. But is it? There is no text to tell us.
Detail from an illustration in 'The Decameron' by Boccacio
The magnificent Flemish illustrated manuscript known as the Hours of Catherine of Cleves, which dates to 1440, contains several illustrations of a sophisticated cut-and-fold box at the bottom of a page devoted to St Agatha. The pictures clearly show how the box is constructed but there is no textual evidence of the material used.
A version of the book 'Tractatus de Spaera Mundi' written by John Holywood, an English mathematician and astronomer, who is also known as Johannes de Sacrobosco, published in Paris in 1498 contains a picture illustrating a solar eclipse which also shows what appear to be two Paper Boats floating in a stylised sea. But are they? There is no text to confirm (or deny) this identification.
Stunts, tricks and entertainments
1584 saw the publication of the book 'The Discoverie of Witchcraft' by Reginald Scott which included an explanation of two simple magical effects using folded paper, the Fold and Switch Effect and the Buddha Papers, variations of both of which are still in use by conjurors today.
The Buddha Papers effect is particularly interesting. It uses two squares folded into thirds in both directions, folded into packages, and glued back to back so that something placed in one package can be shown to have vanished from the other, the audience, of course, being unaware that there is more than one.
This is the earliest instance I know of where paper is folded into thirds, but it had long been done with cloth. For instance, an example of a corporal, a cloth placed on the altar below, and sometimes also above, the communion chalice, folded into thirds in both directions, is shown in Albrecht Dürer's engraving of the 'Mass of St Gregory' which dates from 1511.
Detail from Dürer's 'Mass of St Gregory'
Several other early books also mention stunts, tricks and entertainments using folded paper, one of which is, of course, the paperfolding entertainment called Troublewit, in which a large pleated sheet of paper is transformed into a variety of complicated three-dimensional forms. The earliest description of Troublewit appears in the book 'Sports and Pastimes: or, Sport for the City, and Pastime for the Country; With a touch of Hocus Pocus, or Leger-demain: Fitted for the delight and recreation of Youth' which was printed by H. B. for John Clark, at the Bible and Harp in West-Smithfield, London in 1676. The introductory sentence reads 'Trouble-wit has not its name for nought, and indeed is a very fine invention, by folding a sheet of Paper, as that by Art you may change it into twenty-six several forms or fashions'.
Troublewit quite possibly owes something to the techniques of the earlier art of folding tablecloths and napkins to create fantastical table decorations for formal dining occasions. The first book on this subject was the 'Trattato delle piegature', published in 1629. Its author was Matthias Jäger, who was German, but who published the work under his Italianised name of Mattia Giegher.
Troublewit subsequently featured in a series of books published in France, Spain, Italy and Germany during the 18th Century.
None of this, of course, is yet true recreational paperfolding. Conjurors and entertainers folded paper for a very practical purpose, that of earning money.
Designs folded from playing cards
The 18th Century also saw the emergence, in France, of another form of paperfolding, that of folding playing cards. This probably came about as a result of the use of playing cards to build Card Castles.
We first hear of these in an entry for 6th October 1606 in the journal of Jean Heroard who was the personal doctor of the young Louis XIII. The relevant part of the entry reads 'il s'amuse a faire des chateaux de cartes', in English 'he amused himself making card castles'. Most card castles we can see in paintings and engravings from the 18th Century were built, as they still are, using unfolded cards, but we know from an engraving by Jean Michel Liotard from 1744 that folded cards could also be used.
Folded cards were also sometimes used as skittles, in the way we use dominoes today, so that if one was pushed over all the others fell in turn. Lines of folded cards are shown in several paintings but the idea is particularly clear in this painting from 1871 by the German painter Johann Ernst Heinsius.
By folding a card in half, cutting a slit in the folded edge, and folding the top half upwards, it was possible to create a hooded figure that looked like a capuchin monk. These Playing Card Monks or Capuchins de Cartes also appear in several paintings from the 18th Century, the earliest of which is a watercolour entitled 'Le Petit de Chevilly et Sa Soeur' by Louis Carrogis de Carmontelle which can be dated to somewhere between 1740 and 1760. Playing Card Monks were also used as skittles.
Detail from 'Le Petit de Chevilly et sa Soeur'
The most interesting of the designs made using folded playing cards that emerged during this period was, however, the Playing Card Cube, in which sets of six folded playing cards go together to form cubes, which can then be joined together into larger structures by interlocking their external tabs. In the 20th Century this design became famous under the name of the Business Card Cube. These cubes were featured in several paintings and prints made during the 18th Century, the clearest, though not the earliest, of which is shown below. The painter is unknown but possibly Louis Joseph Watteau (1731 - 1798).
This is still, of course, not quite recreational paperfolding as we know it today, since the main recreational aspect was the use of the cards as toys after they were folded, and not the paperfolding itself. However, it is interesting to see that folded paper (playing cards were made by laminating several layers of paper together) had become an acceptable form of plaything, at least among the wealthy upper classes.
Designs folded from oblongs
Apart from the Buddha Papers, early paperfolding designs are almost all folded from oblongs rather than squares. That was, after all, the normal shape in which paper was manufactured and sold.
Oblongs also form the basis of a type of design we can call fold, slit and fold designs. To make this type of design you first fold the paper, or card, in half, in zigzag fashion, or roll it up and flatten the roll, then cut one or more slits into one or both edges. The paper is then opened out and folded again (though often this folding is only minimal) to produce the design. The Playing Card Monk that we have already met is a design of this type.
One of the earliest known fold, slit and fold designs is what we now call something like the How to Climb Through a Playing Card effect. This effect, made from ordinary paper rather than a Playing Card, first appeared in 1762, under the title 'To make a piece of paper so big that a rider can get through with the horse', in one of a series of books by Albrecht Ernst Friedrich von Crailsheim (which were collected together in one volume as 'Die Zehenmal Hundert und Eine Kunst' in 1766).
A similar method was used to make the little paper ruffles, or manchettes, that are used to decorate the ends of joints of meat, bobeches or drip-catchers for candles, and, during the 19th century to make paper tinsel, decorative spills and Chevron design bookmarks as well. There is mention of paper ruffles on hams in the American periodical Godey's Lady Book of December 1835 in a story entitled 'Mrs. Allington's Pic Nic'. The practice probably, however, goes much further back.
'The Girl's Own Book' by Lydia Marie Child, which was published by Clark Austin and Co in New York in 1833 contains a design made by rolling and slitting paper and the interesting information that 'In England, where they burn coal more than they do here, they fasten sheets of paper together and cut them in this way, to throw over the front of stoves during the summer season.'
Almost all of these fold, slit and fold designs were, of course, made for purely practical purposes, but, like the paper cone, they eventually gave rise to folds that were used for recreational purposes.
There are also, of course, many other designs folded from oblongs that we would now term as pure origami designs, ie designs made without using cuts. There are four particularly important designs of this kind to consider, the paper banger, the paper hat (or hats), the paper boat and the paper plane.
The earliest mention of a paper banger appears in the book 'Onomatologia curiosa artificiosa et magica oder ganz natürliches Zauber-lexicon' published in 1759. This primitive noise-maker is constructed and performed by folding a sheet of oblong paper in half and then in half again, grasping the middle two layers and making a sharp throwing motion with the hand. The more sophisticated Paper Banger design that we are familiar with today, does not appear until the publication of 'De Kleine Papierwerkers 1: Wat men van een stukje papier al maken kan: Het vouwen' (The Little Paperworker 1: What one can make from a piece of paper: Folding) by Elise Van Calcar, in 1863.
There are several early designs for paper hats folded from oblongs, all of which are closely related to each other.
The earliest definitive evidence for a folded paper hat of a known design comes from an oil painting by John Hill, titled Interior of the Carpenter's Shop at Forty Hill, Enfield' which can be dated to around 1800, and shows two carpenters wearing flat-topped, square-shaped paper hats.
Detail from 'Interior of the Carpenter's Shop at Forty Hill, Enfield' by John Hill
This style of paper hat became popular among certain trades during the 19th Century, particularly carpenters and printers, and these hats were still in use by some printers in the USA in the 1950s.
This Workmans Hat is developed from the design that, in the UK, is commonly called the Newspaper Hat, which itself first appears in 1832 in a cartoon Armes du Grand Poulot, which was published in the French satirical magazine 'La Caricature', No 63 of 12 January 1832 (for publishing which the editor of La Caricature, Charles Philipon, was sentenced to six months imprisonment and fined 2000 francs).
Opening out the base of the Newspaper Hat, squashing it flat sideways and folding up the bottom points at back and front produces another, smaller and more solid design, the Pyramidal Hat. This first appears in the book The Boy's Own Toymaker' by Ebenezer Landells which was published in 1859.
Opening out the layers of the Pyramidal Hat produces the Paper Boat. The first time both an illustration and identifying text for this design appear together is also in Landells 1859 book.
There are several previous references to paper boats that are almost certainly this design (and, of course, there is also the 1490 illustration from the 'Tractatus de Spaera Mundi' that we have already mentioned).
(It is worth mentioning that while Paper Boats made in the West are mostly folded from oblongs, the similar designs made in Japan (see above) seem to have been mostly folded from squares.)
On Monday October 24th 1808 Jane Austen wrote a letter to her sister Cassandra which included two references to paper ships, of some undefined kind, but which, it seems to me, are most likely to have been Paper Boats: 'We do not want amusement: bilbocatch, at which George is indefatigable; spillikins, paper ships, riddles, conundrums, and cards, with watching the flow and ebb of the river, and now and then a stroll out, keep us well employed;' and 'While I write now, George is most industriously making and naming paper ships, at which he afterwards shoots with horse-chestnuts brought from Steventon on purpose'.
According to his friend and biographer Thomas Jefferson Hogg, the romantic poet Percy Bysshe Shelley (1792 - 1822) had a passion for folding and sailing paper boats which he made from any paper available at hand including letters and the flyleaves of books. There is no direct evidence that these were Paper Boats, but it seems likely that this was the case.
Hans Christian Anderson's children's fantasy story 'Den standhaftige soldat' (in English 'The Steadfast Tin Soldier') includes reference to a paper boat. It was first published on October 2, 1838 as part of the anthology 'Fairy Tales Told to Children New Collection'. In the story two children make a boat out of newspaper, put the tin soldier in it and send it sailing away down the gutter. From the fact it was folded from newspaper it seems likely that it was a Paper Boat.
The original paper plane was not conceived as a paper plane (aeroplanes did not yet exist) but as a paper dart or arrow. The earliest known illustration of the classic Paper Dart design appears in 'Spielbuch fur Knaben' by Hermann Wagner, which was published in Leipzig in 1864. The first explanation of how to fold one appears in Every Little Boy's Book, which was published in London in the same year.
Simple paper boxes folded from oblongs had probably been used as cake and pastry cases for many years, but the earliest definitive evidence for this practice does not appear until 1889, when a design for such a box, now known as the Patisserie Box, appeared in 'La Science Pratique' by Gaston Tissandier. The text notes that this box is 'employe par les confiseurs' (used by confectioners).
Similarly, oblongs were also folded into suitable containers for powders and small objects, both to contain them and to keep them apart.
In the early 1990's a large number of rodent-chewed Hexagonal Packets containing seeds were discovered in the attic of The Woodlands, a historic estate in Philadelphia, once owned by the botanist William Hamilton (17351840). Some of these bear dates. The example pictured below is dated 1803.
A simpler, rectangular design was explained in 'La Ensenanza del Trabajo Manuel' by Pedro de Alcántara García and Teodosio Leal y Quiroga, which was published in Madrid in 1903, where it is described as 'the bag so useful in pharmacies', now sometimes called the Apothecaries Packet. This design is also, probably, of much greater age.
Designs folded from squares
We have already met the Buddha Papers magical effect, which first appears in 1584. Designs folded from squares are a little thin on the ground thereafter.
1614 saw the first performance of John Webster's play The Duchess of Malfi, the ms for which contains the words 'Our bodies are weaker than those Paper-prisons boys use to keep flies in ...' We do not know what kind of paper prison John Webster had in mind when he wrote those words. It is sometimes taken to be a reference to the design we now call the Waterbomb, which is folded from a square. This is possible, but in my view, quite unlikely at this early date. While there is evidence from the 19th century, that, at that time, Waterbombs were indeed used as prisons for flies, the paper container amplifying the sound of the fly buzzing, presumably to the amusement of little boys, we also have evidence that other kinds of paper construction were used for similar purposes. In fact, any kind of paper container, such as, for instance, a paper cone twisted shut at its open end, could act as a paper-prison in this way.
Better evidence for a design folded from a square can be found in 'Les Jeux et Plaisirs de l'Enfance' which was published in 1657. It contains 50 engravings of naked boys engaged in playing various, often very robust, games, one of which shows them playing darts. The flights of these darts appear to be made from squares of paper folded into waterbomb bases.
Another of the earliest designs folded from a square that we know of is the Puzzle Purse. The earliest evidence for this design that I can find outside Japan is a liebesbrief (love letter) in the collection of the Free Library of Philadelphia dated to 26th December 1769. (The date is in the bottom right corner of the illustration below.) The crease lines that divide the large square into a grid of nine smaller squares and allow it to be collapsed into a puzzle purse are clearly visible. The practice of decorating puzzle purses as love letters was probably brought to Philadelphia by immigrants from Germany.
The earliest evidence that the use of paper for making ad hoc playthings had spread from the aristocracy to the middle class (or at least, the book buying class) comes from Manuel Complet des Jeux de Société' by Elisabeth Celnart which was published in Paris in 1827. This book not only contains sections on fold and cut playing card designs, the Capuchins de Cartes and the Playing Card Cube but also a chapter about Figures de papier plies (paperfolded figures) which explains how to make a bird, a bird in a boat and a small bellows, all from squares. The bird is the design we now know as the Cocotte or Pajarita.
The Cocotte / Pajarita design first appears in the historical record in a painting by Jeanne Elisabeth Chaudet Husson (1767 to 1832) entitled 'Marie-Laetitia Murat portant le buste de Napoléon', which can be dated to 1806. The same painting also features a Playing Card Monk / Capuchin.
The Cocotte / Pajarita design is also mentioned in the book 'Jugenderinnerungen eines altes Mannes' (Youth Memoirs of an Old Man), published by Wilhelm Herz Verlag Berlin in 1870, in which Wilhelm von Kügelgen describes how, in about 1812, when the family were living in Dresden, his then tutor, the painter Carl Adolf Senff (1785-1863), taught him, together with his siblings Gerhard and Adelheid, and the Leipzig friends Alfred and Julius Volksmann, to fold Krahen (crows). It is clear from the description that these Krahen were Cocottes / Pajaritas. The children learned to add further folds to develop these crows into Ross und Reiter (Horses and Riders), some of which still survive in museums in Germany.
However, Elisabeth Celnart was the first to describe how these birds were to be made, and her description is curiously different to the way in which we would fold the Cocotte / Pajarita today. She says, 'Take a square piece, folded lengthwise in half, then fold over the four corners, like making a dog-ear on the page of a book, so that your paper has a double diagonal or oblique line, and repeat the folds, or rather the small dog-ear corners: repeat this manoeuvre three times. When you fold for the third time pull out one of the dog-ear corners at the longest end, which makes the head of the bird, then the opposite end which forms the tail, then lift the two dog-ear corners on each side, which make the wings.' (Translation courtesy of Edwin Corrie) In simpler modern words, blintz a square three times then pull out the internal paper to create points. (You can, of course, do the same thing by blintzing a square just twice.)
From this time onwards Cocottes and two other closely related paperfolds, the Double Boat and the Boat with Sail, begin to appear in caricatures published in French satirical magazines. The earliest of these is the Armes du Grand Poulut cartoon that we have already met. La Caricature published a further caricature in December of the same year (1832), which showed Cocottes of varying sizes, advancing in line to attack a toy village. This drawing also shows two Double Boats and a Boat with Sail. It is worth noting that by this date these designs must have been sufficiently well established in French popular culture for them to be instantly recognised and their significance as symbols of childhood understood.
Both the Double Boat and the Boat with Sail can, like the Cocotte, be produced from a doubly, or triply, blintzed square using the method that Elisabeth Celnart gave in her book. This suggests a connection with a habit that had arisen in Germany in the second half of the 18th Century of folding square Patenbriefs (godparent sponsorship letters) into a double blintz form.
The reason Patenbriefs were folded in this way is not fully understood. It is possible that these paperfolds also functioned as packages to contain the gifts of money that godparents were duty bound to make. However, a doubly blintzed square does not make a very good container for money. Another suggestion is that the design of these foldable Patenbriefs was based on the traditional form of the horoscope that was cast at a childs birth. Horoscopes of this kind are divided into twelve sections and the lines dividing those sections correspond to the crease lines of a doubly blintzed square. However, there is no evidence that horoscopes were ever folded along these lines. It remains a mystery.
A doubly blintzed Patenbrief from 1763
The existence of the doubly blintzed form of the Patenbrief, however, does give rise to a theory to account for the origin of the Cocotte, Double Boat and Boat with Sail. Pull out the internal flaps of a doubly blintzed Patenbrief, in the way explained in Celnart, and arrange them pointing outwards to both sides, fold the result in half, and you have the Double Boat. Manipulate the arms a little and you have the Boat with Sail. Reverse fold the sail and fold down the legs and you have the Cocotte. Unfortunately, this attractive theory remains conjectural since we have no historical evidence of a Patenbrief having been folded into any of these designs in this way.
Recreational paperfolding for girls and boys
The earliest book to treat paperfolding as a recreational activity for children was 'The Boy's Own Book' by William Clarke, which was published in London in 1828 and in New York in 1829. According to Robert William Henderson writing in his 'Ball, Bat, and Bishop: The Origin of Ball Games', which was published by the University of Illinois Press in 2001, It was a tremendous contrast to the juvenile books of the period, which emphasized piety, morals and instruction of mind and soul; it must have been received with whoops of delight by the youngsters of both countries. The paperfolding content consisted of a description of the Paper Furnace effect (where a lead bullet wrapped in paper can be melted without the paper catching fire), Troublewit, the Buddha Papers, the Cherries Puzzle, and a second version of the same effect called the Card Puzzle.
Presumably inspired by this, 'The Girl's Own Book' by Lydia Marie Child, which we have already met, was published in New York in 1833. The paperfolding content of this book consisted of Paper Ball Baskets (how to make baskets of card and decorate them using quilling), Paper Rosette Baskets (baskets made by combining Froebel Stars), Alumets (ornamental paper spills), a way to make a circular Paper Screen (or fan) and several fold and cut effects including the Three Crosses (a version of the Fold and Cut Latin Cross effect).
This book also contains the following interesting passage: 'Folded Papers. There are a variety of things made for the amusement of small children by cutting and folding paper; such as boats, soldiers' hats, birds, chairs, tables, baskets, &c. but they are very difficult to describe; and any little girl who wishes to make them, can learn of some obliging friend in a very few moments.'
The repertoire of designs in books of this kind was at first very small but expanded gradually over time. For instance:
'The Boy's Own Toymaker' by Ebenezer Landells, which was published in London and Boston in 1859 included diagrams for the Paper Boat, the Pyramidal Hat, the Catherine of Cleves Box (the first appearance of this design since 1440) and the Paper Parachute.
'The Girl's Own Toymaker' by Ebenezer Landells and Alice Landells which was published the following year, 1860, again in Boston and London, included diagrams for the Chain of Dolls and the Fold and Cut Paper Doily.
'Spielbuch fur Knaben' by Hermann Wagner, which was published in Leipzig in 1864 included the Seed Container and the Bellows as well as the earliest known illustration of the Paper Dart.
The Popular Recreator', which was published in London in 1873 included diagrams for the Chinese Junk (the earliest known for this design) and the Puzzle Purse.
By the 1880s paperfolding designs began to appear in magazines aimed at children.
In the USA in 1881 St Nicholas magazine published a readers letter explaining and illustrating the Newspaper Ladder and, in the same issue, diagrams for the Fold and One Cut Latin and Maltese Crosses and showed how to arrange all the pieces released by the cutting out of the Latin Cross to form an Altar.
In England in 1886 the Boys Own Paper published diagrams for the Flapping Bird and a written description of how to make the Chinese Junk.
In the USA in 1887 St Nicholas magazine published another readers letter how to make a Japanese design, the Sanbo on Legs, under the somewhat surprising name of 'Nantucket Sinks'.
Friedrich Froebel - The Father of Paperfolding?
Friedrich Froebel, born 1782 and died 1852, was an educationalist from Thuringia, now part of Germany, who developed a theory of education through both teacher directed and self-directed play and founded what became known as the Kindergarten movement. He created a system of 'gifts', objects with which children could play, and by playing, learn. In the beginning there were just five of these gifts, but he later extended the system to include occupations, or as we would probably call them, activities, which would function in the same way. Paperfolding was an integral part of several of these occupations.
The occupations which included some element of paperfolding were:
1. Flechten (Weaving): In this occupation a frame is created by first folding a sheet of paper in half, cutting parallel slits into the folded edge to divide it into strips and then opening it out again. The strips are not loose but stay connected to the outside of the frame at both top and bottom. Other loose strips are woven across the frame, going under and over the upright strips, to create patterns. The way in which the frame is made is, of course, reminiscent of the fold, slit and fold designs we have already met.
2. Ausschneiden und Aufkleben (Cutting Out and Sticking On): In this occupation a square of paper is first folded into an eight-layer right angle isosceles triangle. Parts of the triangle are then cut away and it is unfolded back to the square, then mounted on card or another piece of paper to create a decoration. The parts cut away are then also unfolded and added to the decoration in a symmetric way (the principle being that nothing should be wasted).
3. Verschnüren (Interlacing): In this occupation flat geometric figures are created by folding and interweaving one, or several, paper strips.
4. Falten (Folding): This is paperfolding per se in which squares of paper are folded to create either simple mathematical forms, simple decorative forms or designs that can be interpreted as familiar objects. Froebel called these three types of designs Erkenntnisformen (Learning Forms), Schönheitsformen (Forms of Beauty) and Lebensformen (Forms of Life). (The distinction between Learning Forms, Forms of Beauty and Forms of Life was not only applied to the Falten occupation, but also to the designs children could produce using other occupations and gifts.) Froebels choice of the square as the starting shape for all these types of forms has influenced paperfolding ever since.
It seems likely that the first three occupations listed here were largely, or perhaps entirely, invented by Froebel himself. But what was his personal contribution to the occupation of Falten?
In the case of the Learning Forms we are fortunate to have a fragment of Froebels own writings which explains his approach. This appeared in 'Friedrich Froebel's Gesammelte padogogische schriften' (Friedrich Froebel's Collected Educational Writings) edited by Wichard Lange, which was published in two parts in 1861. It sets out a way to fold and cut a square from an irregular piece of paper, explains how to fold the square in a few basic ways and how making and studying these folds reveals some basic mathematical principles.
We do not, unfortunately, have any similar writings from Froebel himself about either his Forms of Beauty or Forms of Life, and information about this has to be gathered, and often inferred, from the manuals written by his followers.
The earliest illustrations we have of Forms of Beauty appear in Manuel pratique des jardins d'enfants de Frédéric Froebel', which was compiled by J F Jacobs and published in Brussels and Paris in 1859. The patterns illustrated are all derived from a square that has been blintzed, turned over and blintzed again, which I call the Double Blintz Basic Fold. This form has four triangular flaps on one side and four square flaps on the other. Either set of flaps can be folded in various ways to produce Folds of Beauty. All of them are not only folded from squares but are also themselves square in shape and are therefore easy to glue in groups into albums or exercise books.
'Kindergarten Practice' by Mary Gurney, a substantially abridged translation of 'Die Praxis Des Kindergartens' by Auguste Koehler, which was published in 1873, gives 18 Forms of Beauty which the author says were created by Froebel himself. All of them are developed from the Double Blintz Basic Form.
The situation with Forms of Life is less clear. The earliest of the manuals, 'A Practical Guide to the English Kinder Garten' by Joh and Bertha Ronge, which was published in London in 1855, only touches on Forms of Life in passing. The authors say, The material used is a square of paper. Each child, having received his paper, is allowed at first to form any object at pleasure, as in the other games. This being done, the teacher commences her work of development by giving illustrations of different forms, such as a box, basket, ship, boat, stars &c.
The 'Manuel pratique des jardins d'enfants de Frédéric Froebel', from 1859, which we have already met, contains two lists of Forms of Life designs, numbering 45 in all. Not all these designs can be identified, but it is clear that they are mainly, if not entirely, derived from four basic folds, the Double Blintz Basic Fold, The Triple Blintz Basic Fold (made by turning the Double Blintz Basic Fold over and blintzing for a third time), the Doubly Blintzed Square with all the internal points pulled out (what we would now call the Windmill Base) and the Triply Blintzed Square with all the internal points pulled out (what we would now call the Blintzed Windmill Base).
The forms derived from the Doubly Blintzed Square include the Double Boat, the Cocotte / Pajarita and the Boat with Sail which we know predate Froebels invention of the Falten occupation. However, other designs derived from this basic fold, the Windmill, the Cigar-Case, the Vase, the Boat with Fishbox, the Portfolio, The Open Box, The Frame, The Mirror and the Gondola all appear here in the historical record for the first time.
Most of the forms derived from the Triply Blintzed Square, the Double Hulled Boat, the Junk Box, the Picture Frame, the Looking Glass are also previously unknown, the exception being the design with which the sequence culminates, the gondola with sails, which is almost certainly the Chinese Junk.
The forms derived from the Doubly Blintz Basic Fold (or more correctly those forms which can be identified since some cannot), among them the Salt-Cellar, the Pepperpot, the Travel Bag, the Flat Flower and the Collar, are also, again with one possible exception, previously unknown. The exception in this case is the Salt Cellar. A reference to paper salt-cellars occurs in the November 1836 issue of The Lady's Book, a women's magazine published in Philadelphia, USA. Unfortunately, since there is no illustration it is impossible to be know whether these paper salt-cellars are the design familiar to us, or simply paper screwed into a basic dish-like form.
The forms derived from the Triple Blintz Basic Form, the Muff, the Pair of Boots, the Jacket, the Trousers and the Cross are all also mentioned here for the first time.
What are we to make of all this? Were all these designs invented by Froebel (in which case he should surely be a contender for the title of Father of Paperfolding) or by his immediate followers, or had they previously existed but never been mentioned or pictured before? The answer is, of course, that we do not know, but it seems most likely that most of them, at least, are discoveries of Froebel and his immediate followers, and in particular those developed from the Doubly and Triply Blintzed Basic Forms. Elsewhere in the literature these two forms are called the first and second groundforms and are attributed to Froebel himself.
There is one anomaly to consider. One of the illustrations in the book "Hanenpoot" which Willem Bilderdijk wrote and illustrated for his young son Julius Willem in 1806, shows a version of the Chinese Junk design that is blunt at one end and pointed at the other, the pointed end being arranged as a continuation of the line of the main deck of the boat. As far as I am aware there is no other illustration of this type of Chinese Junk in the Western European literature. All the others have either two blunt ends, or, if is pointed, it sticks upwards like a sail. There are however several illustrations of Chinese Junk like designs from Japan, the earliest dating to 1704, which do have pointed ends arranged in the main plane of the design. These are usually referred to as takara-bune or treasure ships. It is possible, therefore, that the version drawn by Willem Bilderdijk was somehow imported from Japan and that there is no direct connection between this 1806 illustration and the Froebelian version. However, the evidence is clearly inconclusive and for now at least it remains a mystery.
'Die Praxis Des Kindergartens' by Auguste Koehler, which was published in 1873, and which we have already met in translation, states that in Froebel's time only one method of developing a square was known, that of folding the corners inwards (ie blintzing the square). The author says that he developed a second method, that of folding the edges inwards, (ie bookfolding the square) which was published in his earlier work relating to paperfolding. (The footnote identifies this as 'Kindergarten and Elementarklasse. II Jahrang. Weimar. Bohlau 1861', but I have not been able to trace a copy of this work.) To modern folders this may seem an unimportant distinction, but this discovery seems to have led Auguste Koehler to design the Pig, which is first published in this work (or, perhaps, in the earlier work which I cannot find). Modern folders are not generally over-impressed with the Pig design, yet it was revolutionary in its time. In their book 'Froebel's Occupations', published in 1896, Kate Douglas Wiggin and Nora Archibald Smith call it design the crowning glory of the sequence, a star of the purest ray and the first magnitude.' And so it was.
Forms of Life in the Kindergarten Manuals
Froebels original conception of the paperfolding occupations seem to have been that they should be quite limited in their scope. All the occupations had a specific purpose. They were not general activities to provide interest for children in the kindergarten classroom, but activities intended to allow the child to acquire specific pieces of knowledge.
In practice, however, over the years, the original ideas and material for these occupations became vastly expanded. This seems to have happened in two ways.
Firstly, children (and their teachers) were actively encouraged to experiment. Froebelian occupations were not (at least at first) a sterile reproduction of existing designs (although that did tend to be the effect the manuals had). New designs were invented and shared and became part of the repertoire. Old designs fell out of fashion and favour. We have already seen that this happened, for instance, with the Pig.
Secondly, designs were absorbed into the Froebelian repertoire from outside. For instance, 'De Kleine Papierwerkers 1' by Elise Van Calcar, published in 1863, which we have already met, includes illustration or mention of the Talking Fish, the Waterbomb, the Bellows, the Paper Banger, the Puzzle Purse and the Pipe Cap, none of which are developed from Froebels groundforms. The first four appear here in the historical record for the first time, so could conceivably have been recently invented within the kindergarten context (though I find that unlikely), but there is definitive evidence that the last two were already known and so have been imported into the Froebelian repertoire from outside. There are many other instances where we can similarly show that existing paperfolding designs were incorporated into the Froebelian repertoire. (Something which also happened in Japan.)
Of course, it is likely that a child who learned a paperfold at kindergarten might then reproduce it at home, teach it to their siblings and friends, who would then in turn show it to their friends etc. There is no direct evidence of that process occurring but we know that this kind of meme-like dissemination of designs has occurred widely in our own lifetimes, for instance with the Paper Dart and the Fortune Teller, and it would be surprising if it had not also occurred in earlier times.
In this way, I suspect, the use of paperfolding occupations in kindergarten education contributed both to the expansion of the paperfolding design repertoire and to the recreational use of paperfolding as childrens play.
Paperfolding as an aid to manual training
In 1849 the French publication 'Bulletin de la Societe D'Encouragement Pour L'Industrie Nationale' published a report by the mathematician Theodore Olivier, titled 'Enseignement Industriel - Geometrie Pratique', which explained a new method, discovered by Martin Chatelain, of teaching practical geometry using paperfolding. The report recommends its use in the teaching of apprentices. Full details of the method are, unfortunately, not given.
On 27th July 1882 the French government minister, Jules Ferry, issued a decree regulating the pedagogical organisation and the study plan of public primary schools (Arrêté du 27 juillet 1882 réglant lorganisation pédagogique et le plan détudes des écoles primaires publiques) which made it mandatory for French primary schools to include manual work (activities designed to aid the development of manual skills, which would then be useful in an industrial and economic context) in their curricula. There is no specific mention of paperfolding in this decree (although it does mention cardboard modelling /cartonnage) but a second decree issued a day later (Arrete reglant l'organisation pedagogique des maternelles publique et les programmes d'enseignement) did mention pliage (paperfolding) several times. Many primary schools subsequently began to include paperfolding as part of their manual work syllabus and, as had happened with Froebelian kindergarten education, publishers then began issuing manual work textbooks to assist teachers incorporating this element in their lessons. Many of these textbooks included paperfolding elements.
For instance, 'Cours de Travail Manuel (Pour les Garcons) - Premiere Partie - Cours Elementaire' by A Planty, which was published in Paris in 1887, explains how to fold a Chapeau du Gendarme (a version of the Newspaper Hat), a simple wallet, the Table, The Windmill, the Cocotte, some strip folded letters and various decorations that in a Froebelian context we would call Forms of Beauty.
In a more formal context, the 'Bulletin de la Société de Protection des Apprentis', an official document issued by the Société de Protection des Apprentis et des Enfants Employes par les Manufactures in Paris in 1891, sets out educational syllabuses which make use of paperfolding. It includes, among other folds, the Waterbomb, the Patisserie Box and La Grenouille Japonaise (otherwise known as the Blow-Up Frog).
Initially, these textbooks are all published in French but magazine articles and books about manual work, including paperfolding, begin to appear in Spanish from 1903 onwards. 'La Ensenanza del Trabajo Manuel' by Pedro de Alcántara García and Teodosio Leal y Quiroga, was published in Madrid in 1903, closely followed by Guia Practica del Trabajo Manual Educativo' by Ezequiel Solana, which was published in 1904. I do not know if these Spanish publications were also produced in response to a change in educational law, or whether manual work became popular in Spanish schools for some other reason.
It seems obvious that the result of teaching paperfolding in schools as a means of increasing manual dexterity must also, surely, have acted to increase the recreational use of paperfolding as childrens play.
The Cocotte / Pajarita in France and Spain
Of all the paperfolds that were widely known in the 19th Century the Cocotte / Pajarita was the one that was most deeply embedded in popular culture. We have already seen that the earliest evidence for its existence comes from France, although it is possible that it originated from the practice of folding Patenbriefs into a doubly blintzed form, and that it appeared in several satirical cartoons in the magazine La Caricature in 1832.
While knowledge of how to fold the Cocotte /Pajarita, and enjoyment of it as a toy, was not limited to the French, it was in France that images featuring Cocottes appeared most regularly. The word cocotte can mean a hen or a casserole dish but can also mean a high-class prostitute. It can also, like the Newspaper Hat, which has similarly been absorbed into popular culture, be used as a symbol of childhood or childishness. The design of the Cocotte is usually interpreted as a bird, but it is also often seen as a horse (or perhaps a hobby-horse) and images of people riding Cocottes as though they are horses are common.
The Cocotte is used as a symbol, carrying all these various meanings, in many other caricatures, in paintings, in literature and on postcards throughout the 19th Century, and well into the 20th as well. I have collected many of these references on the Cocotte / Pajarita pages on my Public Paperholding History Project site. Just a few of them are shown below.
The image below is a detail from a print by Charles Bargue (after Auguste Toulmouche), which is in the collection of the British museum and can be dated to 1860. It shows a governess (probably) building a Card Castle while the children look on, but there are also a number of folded Cocottes on the table.
Les Cocottes' by Paul Mahalin, was published in Paris in 1864. It contains observations of the daily habits of Parisian prostitutes and a discussion of their role in society. The frontispiece pictures two different kinds of cocotte.
Detail from the Frontispece of 'Les Cocottes' by Paul Mahalin
The pornographic novel 'Souvenirs dune cocodette', supposedly a memoir by the main character, Aimee, but in fact by Ernest Feydeau, and first published in Paris in 1870, contains a frontispiece showing a Cocotte covering, or perhaps censoring, the nakedness of the cocodette of the title.
This postcard shows Leopold II of Belgium riding a Cocotte. The crossed out 'C' that makes the name 'Cleopold' seems to be a reference to the ballet dancer Cleo de Mérode. The image probably dates from 1896 when Leopold II attended the ballet and saw Mérode dance. The 61-year-old Belgian King became enamoured with the 21-year-old ballet star, and she became his mistress.
The Cocotte design also became absorbed into popular culture in Spain, as the Pajarita.
From 1874 onwards, drawings of Pajaritas feature frequently in the work of the Catalan artist Apeles Mestres (who also drew the earliest image we have of the Flapping Bird see below).
An article entitled 'Pajaritologia', by Senesio Delgado, which uses the folding of Cocottes / Pajaritas to make points about art and contemporary thought, was published in the Spanish satirical magazine 'Madrid Comico on 13th January 1894.
Pajaritas were also an important part of the paperfolding odyssey of the famous Spanish philosopher Miguel de Unamuno (also see below), but only really seem to have come to the fore in popular Spanish culture after the 1920s.
Japonisme, the Blow-up Frog and the invention of the Flapping Bird
After Japan came out of her self-imposed period of isolation in 1853, Japanese design, particularly in the form of prints, furniture and ceramics, began to have a huge influence in Western Europe, particularly in France, and it became very fashionable to own Japanese objects.
In 1868 (or possibly 1869) a small number of enthusiasts for things Japanese formed a drinking club in Paris called the 'Société de Jing-lar'. Each member was issued with a membership card, three of which have survived. These membership cards are illustrated with drawings of orizuru, or Paper Cranes. This is the first time images of this design had appeared in the West. Unfortunately, we have no idea how the founders of Société de Jing-lar came to know about the Paper Crane or even whether or not they knew how to fold it.
There are similar images in other publications dating from 1888 and 1891 but diagrams for the Paper Crane do not appear until 1902, when they were published in an issue of the childrens magazine Mon Journal.
The influence of Japanese design in the West was reinforced by Japans participation in the Expositions Universelle held in Paris in 1867 (where there were two Japanese pavilions, one official and one private, funded by the Satsuma family), 1878, 1889 and 1900.
Japans participation in the 1889 Exposition was particularly important from the point of view of paperfolding history. The magazine La Nature Issue 852 of 28th September 1889 contained an article headed 'Recreation scientifiques' and subheaded 'La grenouille japonaise en papier' (The Japanese Paper Frog) which explains how to make the Blow-up Frog (though the author does not appear to be aware that the frog can be inflated).
The article is interesting not only for the diagrams it contains, but also for the incidental information it provides. In his introductory paragraphs the author, Dr Z , states, roughly, 'The Ministry of Public Education of Japan has sent to the Exhibition an interesting series of industrial and artistic designs ... made by children of both sexes in the country's school rooms ... but one can notice others which are not less curious. These are the recreational works done by the small children of the Azabu private school in Tokyo. The series of displays showing cut out and coloured papers combined to make flowers, butterflies or marquetry designs are quite attractive and our children would probably be happy to know how to make such pretty things. In France, it is true, we also know the charming game of folding paper. The classic Cocotte, the box and the galiote etc., are popular here but we must agree that the Japanese have more ingenious models. The Frog that we put in front of our young readers is an example, and, We also noticed in the exhibition other designs among which were the crab from red paper, the junk and the hat of Daimios, the parrot etc., The way these designs are made has many points of resemblance to the Frog.'
Another article by 'Dr Z... in La Nature, in issue 1093 of 12th May 1894, contained an opening paragraph which read, roughly, 'We have previously published several recreations that can be made with paper; we gave the way of making a bird, whose wings can be made to move. This invention is Japanese; the Japanese made it known, with great success, at the Exposition of Paris in 1889.' This is not impossible, of course, though it is unlikely since footnote 1 of the article makes it clear that the previous publication of the Flapping Bird in 'La Nature' was in 1885.
The 1885 article in La Nature was the first time that diagrams for the Flapping Bird, there called Un Oiseau Mecanique en Papier, had been published, but a drawing of the Flapping Bird had previously appeared in a pictorial story by Apeles Mestres which is clearly dated 2nd August 1883. The words below the picture of the flapping bird read, 'This story was told to me by a swallow that came flying from paper country.
Detail from a pictorial story by Apeles Mestres
We do not know how or where the Flapping Bird was created. It is possible that the Flapping Bird was a Japanese invention that was brought to Europe, perhaps by conjurors as the La Nature article suggests, and perhaps first appeared in the West at the 1878 Exposition Universelle. The difficulty with this theory is that the Flapping Bird does not appear in any Japanese sources during our period. It is equally possible that the Flapping Birds Japanese origin was made up in order to make it more interesting to La natures readers (a not unknown phenomenon of Japonisme) and that it was in fact discovered in Western Europe, perhaps by someone who was trying to remember how to fold the Paper Crane, who then found, remarkably, that this misremembered version would flap its wings if the tail were pulled. Once again, we simply do not know.
The paperfolding of Miguel de Unamuno
Miguel de Unamuno, born in 1864 and died in 1936, was a Spanish academic, author and thinker who was also influential in the development of paperfolding in Spain and beyond.
In 1888 he published an account, 'Historia de Unas Pajaritas de Papel', of how, when he was 10 years old, he and his cousin folded and played with paper pajaritas and other toys during the bombing of Bilbao during the Third Carlist War.
1n 1902 the Argentinean magazine Caras y Caretas published a letter from Unamuno which was illustrated by a picture of what he called the 'most perfect paper pajarita known', 'although, to be sure, starting out from other figures'. The design is developed from a bird base and appears to be an early version of his Avechucho, made with a simpler head and beak than later versions. We do not know with certainty what the 'other figures' it was derived from were, but, the obvious candidates are either the Paper Crane or the Flapping Bird.
Unamuno amd his 'most perfect paper pajarita known'
In April of the same year Unamunos second novel 'Amor y pedagogía' was published. The original manuscript for this novel was shorter than the publisher required so it was lengthened by the addition of a foreword, an epilogue and a treatise on the Cocotte / Pajarita design titled 'Apuntes para un tratado de cocotología'. This treatise was attributed to Don Fulgencio, one of the main characters in the story. Much of it seems to be deliberately obscure. (This treatise may have been inspired by the article 'Pajaritologia', by Senesio Delgado, which had been published in 1894. It is possible that Unamuno called his paperfolding cocotologia because the more obvious, more Spanish, term, pajaritalogia had already been used.)
Unamuno went on to devise a number of other designs from the bird base, including several other birds, a seal, a teapot and an Empire style table.
Photograph from Estampa showing a few of Unamuno's designs
Unamunos design work inspired the Spanish / Argentinean paperfolding tradition that was to become so important during the 1940s and 1950s.
Back to the conjurors
As we have seen, the Blow-up Frog first became known in the West at the Exposition Universelle in Paris in 1889 (the event for which the Eiffel Tower was constructed). This same exhibition, and in particular the display of paperfolds made by schoolchildren that were on display in the Japanese Pavilion, seems also to have been the main inspiration for a series of articles written by the conjuror Alber (real name Jean Jacques Édouard Graves) and published in the French childrens magazine Mon Journal between 1899 and 1902. These articles contained explanations of, and diagrams for several paperfolds of Japanese origin which are not previously known in the West, among them, Le Lampion (the Mushikago), le Kiosque Japonais, the Palanquin, the Lily and a Crab made using cuts. His book Les petits secret amusant, published in 1908, later brought many of the same designs to a wider audience.
Alber attributed his detailed knowledge of these designs to a Japanese friend variously named as Mlle Kawala, Mlle Kawada or Madame Kawada. This is somewhat odd if 'Mlle Kawala' etc was a real person and it is therefore possibly that she is apocryphal and that Alber learned his designs from some other source.
The importance of Albers articles and books lies not only in the Japanese connection but also that in researching and writing them he was initiating a trend. From around the end of the following decade it became common for conjurors to write books about paperfolding, partly as a way of earning money, but also partly, I believe, because the act of folding something out of a piece of paper has the same appeal as, for instance, making a rabbit appear from an empty hat.
1919 saw the publication of Paper Tricks by Will Goldston, 1920 of Paper Magic by Will Blyth, 1922 Houdinis Paper Magic by Harry Houdini (though possibly ghost written by Walter B Gibson), 1923 More Paper Magic, again by Will Blyth. The most influential of all these books, Fun with Paper Folding by William D Murray and Francis J Rigney, followed five years later in 1928.
The first four of these books are mostly collections of paperfolding and papercutting effects that are in some way magical, or at least, suitable for presentation as entertainment. The last book is different. As the title implies it is a collection of paperfolds, some Froebelian classics, some the authors' own designs, some possibly collected by William Murray during his travels in China, which are intended to be folded for recreation, for 'fun' as the title puts it.
Just as in Japan with the publication of Isao Honda's 'Origami Part One', so in Western Europe and the USA, with the publication of 'Fun with Paper Folding', we have reached the point where paperfolding has begun to become a popular pastime.